Listen to the Article: Limited Brokers + Increasing Retail Trading Demand = Growing Prop Firms

​

Since last year, Fazzaco has closely observed the rise and development of the proprietary trading sector. Prop trading firms, sometimes referred to as Trader Funded Firms (TFF), are hardly a new concept. Jason Kovalcin, the Business Development Manager at Tradeview Markets, mentioned in an exclusive interview with Fazzaco​, "Proprietary trading firms have been around for decades in the Chicago trading community." However, the surge in prop trading primarily occurred in 2022. Today, we'll explore the equation that has fueled the sharp rise in the popularity of prop trading, and see if it is actually the case: Limited Brokers + Increasing Retail Trading Demand = Growing Prop Firms.

Prop Trading: A Low-Cost Alternative

The emergence of prop trading firms can be attributed to the increasing restrictions placed on retail brokers. In recent years, regulatory scrutiny on retail brokers has intensified, a trend observed globally, whether in regions with strict regulations such as the US, UK, Europe, or in more lenient offshore financial centers like Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.

The reasons behind this heightened scrutiny can be traced back to the banking crisis of 2023 and the global economic downturn, events that alerted regulatory authorities to the vulnerability of capital markets. For instance, the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) planned to introduce new regulations in 2023, mandating brokers to disclose more details about their trading activities, including trade volume, size, and profit/loss. Additionally, brokers faced extra requirements such as setting up brick-and-mortar offices and increasing capital pools to ensure the security of user deposits. Meanwhile, mainstream trading software platforms like MetaQuotes imposed various restrictions on offshore retail brokers, making license acquisition processes more stringent and white-label acquisition more challenging.

In this scenario, prop firms emerged as an opportune choice. Compared to brokers, prop firms have a simpler business structure; they do not require licenses, white-label trading platforms, or marketing restrictions. Before the US compelled MetaQuotes to crack down on grey-labeled prop firms in February 2024, these firms enjoyed unfettered freedom, presenting an "Eden" scenario for many startup brokers.

How Do They Make Their Money When They Are Funding Traders in the First Place?

Naturally, business is about making money. While it may appear that prop firms, by funding traders, aim for mutual profit, the ways they monetize this model are more intricate. While prop firms provide substantial startup fund to enlisted traders, they typically also levy various charges. Apart from extracting profits from trading earnings, they charge traders for platform usage, technology, and resources, often referred to as "desk fees." Novice traders may also need to pay a one-time trial fee. Additionally, there are ancillary fees, such as requiring traders to achieve minimum profit points or increase maximum drawdown amounts.

Beyond these fundamental charges, prop firms can generate supplementary income through various means, depending on their strategies. For example, some firms offer paid educational programs for novice traders to master skills and market analysis. These programs may encompass online courses, seminars, and trading guidance, enabling prop firms to earn revenue from educational services.

Furthermore, prop firms can collaborate with brokers, introducing traders to become clients. This typically exists in the form of introducing brokers (IBs). Prop firms receive commissions or rebates as rewards for traders becoming clients of brokers.

Brokers and Proprietary Firms: Conversion or Coexistence?

Factually, since 2021, the regulatory barriers for retail forex brokers have gradually increased, while simultaneously, the interest of investors in retail trading and online trading markets has continued to rise during and after the pandemic era. With brokers facing various restrictions, the rise of the prop trading industry seems to meet market demands perfectly.

Therefore, one might ask, will brokers and prop firms convert or coexist? This is a question of significant concern. After all, with demand on one side and brokers constrained to fulfill that demand, the rise of the prop trading industry seems to perfectly validate the equation we initially proposed.